quebec: french-speaking region of canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents canada
Weight: 0.64
, province
Weight: 0.61
, region
Weight: 0.56
, city
Weight: 0.55
, territory
Weight: 0.54
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.37
, ontario
Weight: 0.35
, alberta
Weight: 0.35
, alaska
Weight: 0.34
, toronto
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
french-speaking region of canada 1.00
be in canada 0.93
be part of canada 0.92
be important to canada 0.92
be different from canada 0.90
be similar to canada 0.89
leave canada 0.89
stay part of canada 0.88
separate from canada 0.87
provide for canada 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(territory, be important to canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(quebec, french-speaking region of canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(territory, be important to canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(territory, be important to canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ontario, be important to canada)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ontario, be in canada)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alberta, be important to canada)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(quebec city, be important to canada)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(alberta, separate from canada)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(territory, be important to canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(quebec, french-speaking region of canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ontario, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(ontario, be in canada)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(quebec city, be important to canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(quebec city, be important to canada)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(alberta, be important to canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(alberta, be important to canada)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(alberta, separate from canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(alberta, separate from canada)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ontario, be important to canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(ontario, be important to canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(quebec, french-speaking region of canada)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(quebec, be in canada)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(quebec, be in canada)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(quebec, be part of canada)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(quebec, be part of canada)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(quebec, be in canada)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(quebec, leave canada)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(quebec, leave canada)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(quebec, be part of canada)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(quebec, stay part of canada)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(quebec, separate from canada)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(quebec, be important to canada)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(quebec, leave canada)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(quebec, be different from canada)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(quebec, be similar to canada)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(quebec, separate from canada)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(quebec, leave canada)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(quebec, stay part of canada)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(quebec, separate from canada)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(quebec, be similar to canada)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(quebec, provide for canada)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(quebec, stay part of canada)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(quebec, provide for canada)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(quebec, be different from canada)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(quebec, be similar to canada)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(quebec, be different from canada)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(quebec, provide for canada)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(quebec, be important to canada)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(quebec, be important to canada)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(quebec, be important to canada)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(quebec, be in canada)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(quebec, be different from canada)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(quebec, be part of canada)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(quebec, be similar to canada)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(quebec, provide for canada)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(quebec, separate from canada)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(quebec, stay part of canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(quebec, french-speaking region of canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(quebec, french-speaking region of canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(territory, be important to canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(alberta, separate from canada)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(ontario, be in canada)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(alberta, be important to canada)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(quebec city, be important to canada)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ontario, be important to canada)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(quebec, french-speaking region of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(territory, be important to canada)