quebec: was divided into canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents canada
Weight: 0.64
, province
Weight: 0.61
, region
Weight: 0.56
, city
Weight: 0.55
, territory
Weight: 0.54
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.37
, ontario
Weight: 0.35
, alberta
Weight: 0.35
, alaska
Weight: 0.34
, toronto
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was divided into canada 1.00
was divided into lower canada 0.97
split from canada 0.92
separate from canada 0.89
be different from canada 0.89
separate from rest of canada 0.88
be in canada 0.88
be part of canada 0.88
be different from rest of canada 0.88
be important to canada 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(territory, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(quebec, was divided into canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(territory, be important to canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(territory, be important to canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ontario, be important to canada)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ontario, be in canada)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alberta, be important to canada)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(quebec city, be important to canada)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(alberta, separate from canada)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(territory, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(quebec, was divided into canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(alberta, separate from canada)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(alberta, separate from canada)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(quebec city, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(quebec city, be important to canada)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(alberta, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(alberta, be important to canada)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ontario, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(ontario, be in canada)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ontario, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(ontario, be important to canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(quebec, was divided into canada)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(quebec, was divided into lower canada)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(quebec, was divided into lower canada)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(quebec, split from canada)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(quebec, be different from canada)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(quebec, separate from canada)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(quebec, be different from rest of canada)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(quebec, be important to canada)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(quebec, be part of canada)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(quebec, separate from rest of canada)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(quebec, be in canada)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(quebec, separate from canada)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(quebec, was divided into lower canada)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(quebec, be in canada)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(quebec, was divided into lower canada)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(quebec, separate from canada)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(quebec, be part of canada)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(quebec, split from canada)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(quebec, split from canada)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(quebec, separate from canada)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(quebec, split from canada)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(quebec, separate from rest of canada)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(quebec, be in canada)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(quebec, be part of canada)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(quebec, be in canada)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(quebec, be part of canada)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(quebec, separate from rest of canada)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(quebec, separate from rest of canada)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(quebec, be different from canada)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(quebec, be different from canada)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(quebec, be different from rest of canada)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(quebec, be important to canada)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(quebec, be different from canada)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(quebec, be different from rest of canada)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(quebec, be important to canada)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(quebec, be different from rest of canada)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(quebec, be important to canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(quebec, was divided into canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(quebec, was divided into canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(territory, be important to canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(alberta, separate from canada)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(ontario, be in canada)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(alberta, be important to canada)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(quebec city, be important to canada)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ontario, be important to canada)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(quebec, was divided into canada)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(territory, be important to canada)