queen: be at deck of card

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents royal
Weight: 0.65
, monarch
Weight: 0.64
, star
Weight: 0.63
, band
Weight: 0.63
Siblings queen elizabeth
Weight: 0.78
, king
Weight: 0.66
, prince
Weight: 0.36
, rock star
Weight: 0.33
, actress
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at deck of card 1.00
be at card 0.87
be used to play chess or card 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(queen, be at deck of card)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(king, be at deck of card)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(queen, be at deck of card)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(king, be at card)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(queen, be at deck of card)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(king, be at deck of card)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(king, be at deck of card)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(queen, be at deck of card)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(king, be at card)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(king, be at card)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(queen, be at deck of card)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(queen, be at deck of card)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(queen, be at deck of card)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(queen, be used to play chess or card)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(queen, be at deck of card)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(queen, be used to play chess or card)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(queen, be at deck of card)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(queen, be used to play chess or card)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(queen, be at deck of card)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(queen, be used to play chess or card)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(queen, be at deck of card)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(queen, be at deck of card)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(queen, be at deck of card)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(queen, be at deck of card)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(queen, be at deck of card)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(queen, be at deck of card)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(king, be at deck of card)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(queen, be at deck of card)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(king, be at card)