queensland: has state jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.55
, country
Weight: 0.51
, australia
Weight: 0.47
, event
Weight: 0.46
Siblings tasmania
Weight: 0.33
, brisbane
Weight: 0.33
, adelaide
Weight: 0.33
, western australia
Weight: 0.33
, idaho
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state jobs 1.00
has state state 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(queensland, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, has state jobs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(queensland, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(queensland, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(idaho, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(queensland, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(tasmania, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tasmania, has state jobs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(queensland, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(idaho, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(idaho, has state state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(queensland, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tasmania, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(queensland, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(queensland, has state jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(queensland, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(queensland, has state state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(queensland, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(queensland, has state state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(queensland, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(queensland, has state state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(queensland, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(queensland, has state state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(queensland, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(queensland, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(queensland, has state jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(queensland, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(queensland, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(queensland, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(idaho, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(queensland, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tasmania, has state jobs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(queensland, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tasmania, has state state)