question: be important in communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents challenge
Weight: 0.66
, answer
Weight: 0.65
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.62
Siblings fairness
Weight: 0.66
, big bang
Weight: 0.65
, argument
Weight: 0.62
, penis
Weight: 0.59
, rumor
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in communication 1.00
be important part of communication 0.98
be related to communication 0.93
be important to gilgamesh 0.77
be important in leadership 0.76
be important in business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(question, be important in communication)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(question, be important in communication)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(challenge, be related to communication)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(question, be important in communication)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(challenge, be related to communication)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(issue, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important in business)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(challenge, be related to communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fairness, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fairness, be important in leadership)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(argument, be important part of communication)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(challenge, be related to communication)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(question, be important in communication)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(question, be important in communication)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(question, be important in communication)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(argument, be important part of communication)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(argument, be important part of communication)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fairness, be important in leadership)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(fairness, be important in leadership)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fairness, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(fairness, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(question, be important in communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(question, be important in communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(challenge, be related to communication)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(fairness, be important in leadership)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fairness, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(argument, be important part of communication)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(challenge, be related to communication)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(question, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)