question: funny

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents challenge
Weight: 0.66
, answer
Weight: 0.65
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.62
Siblings fairness
Weight: 0.66
, big bang
Weight: 0.65
, argument
Weight: 0.62
, penis
Weight: 0.59
, rumor
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
funny 1.00
is funny 0.99
look funny 0.94
be considered funny 0.93
is amusing 0.86
be stupid 0.79
is creepy 0.77
is annoying 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(question, funny)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(penis, be considered funny)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(question, funny)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(penis, be considered funny)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(penis, be considered funny)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(question, funny)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(question, funny)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(question, funny)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(question, is funny)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(question, funny)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(question, is funny)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(question, funny)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(question, is funny)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(question, funny)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(question, be stupid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(question, funny)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(question, is funny)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(question, funny)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(question, be stupid)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(question, funny)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(question, be stupid)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(question, funny)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(question, be stupid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(question, funny)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(question, funny)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(question, funny)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(question, funny)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(question, funny)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(question, funny)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(penis, be considered funny)