ra: have insane win rate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents name
Weight: 0.55
, condition
Weight: 0.53
, factor
Weight: 0.52
, god
Weight: 0.50
Siblings taj mahal
Weight: 0.33
, albert einstein
Weight: 0.33
, na
Weight: 0.33
, leo
Weight: 0.33
, el nino
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have insane win rate 1.00
have win rate 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ra, have insane win rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(ra, have insane win rate)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(ra, have insane win rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(ra, have win rate)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(ra, have insane win rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ra, have win rate)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(ra, have insane win rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ra, have win rate)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ra, have insane win rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(ra, have win rate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(ra, have insane win rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(ra, have insane win rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(ra, have insane win rate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ra, have insane win rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(ra, have insane win rate)