rabbit: be called like baby

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.73
, rodent
Weight: 0.69
, pet
Weight: 0.67
Siblings guinea pig
Weight: 0.74
, lizard
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.39
, cat
Weight: 0.38
, monkey
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called like baby 1.00
eat baby 0.89
be afraid of baby powder 0.84
make babies 0.83
have babies 0.83
eat babies 0.81
have many babies 0.81
kill babies 0.80
have chicken babies 0.79
abandon babies 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(rodent, eat babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(rabbit, be called like baby)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rabbit, be called like baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(rodent, eat babies)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, be called like baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(rodent, eat babies)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, be called like baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(lizard, have babies)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, be called like baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cat, have babies)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(rodent, eat babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(rabbit, be called like baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(rabbit, be called like baby)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rabbit, be called like baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(lizard, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(lizard, have babies)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rabbit, be called like baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cat, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(cat, have babies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rabbit, be called like baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(rabbit, be called like baby)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rabbit, be called like baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(rabbit, eat baby)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(rabbit, be called like baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(rabbit, eat baby)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(rabbit, be called like baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, eat baby)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(rabbit, be called like baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(rabbit, eat baby)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(rabbit, be called like baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(rabbit, have babies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(rabbit, be called like baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, have babies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rabbit, be called like baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(rabbit, have babies)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(rabbit, be called like baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(rabbit, have babies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(rabbit, be called like baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(rabbit, be called like baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, be called like baby)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rabbit, be called like baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(rabbit, be called like baby)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, be called like baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(rodent, eat babies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, be called like baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(lizard, have babies)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, be called like baby) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, have babies)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(rabbit, be called like baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(rodent, eat babies)