rabbit: has physical part whiskers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.73
, rodent
Weight: 0.69
, pet
Weight: 0.67
Siblings guinea pig
Weight: 0.74
, lizard
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.39
, cat
Weight: 0.38
, monkey
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part whiskers 1.00
has physical part hair 0.86
has physical part teeth 0.84
has physical part tails 0.82
has physical part eyes 0.82
has physical part claws 0.81
has physical part paws 0.81
has physical part dewlap 0.81
has physical part legs 0.81
has physical part tail 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pet, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rodent, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pet, has physical part whiskers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pet, has physical part whiskers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cat, has physical part whiskers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, has physical part whiskers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(monkey, has physical part tail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cat, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cat, has physical part claws)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(cat, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pet, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rodent, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(guinea pig, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, has physical part whiskers)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(cat, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(cat, has physical part eyes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cat, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(cat, has physical part tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(cat, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cat, has physical part whiskers)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cat, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(cat, has physical part claws)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(monkey, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(monkey, has physical part tail)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(lizard, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(monkey, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part tail)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(rabbit, has physical part tail)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part tail)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part tail)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has physical part tail)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part tails)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part tails)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has physical part tails)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(rabbit, has physical part tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pet, has physical part whiskers)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(guinea pig, has physical part whiskers)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(monkey, has physical part tail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part whiskers)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part tail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part eyes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part claws)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pet, has physical part whiskers)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails)