racism: was in 1930s

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bigotry
Weight: 0.71
, prejudice
Weight: 0.66
, injustice
Weight: 0.65
, inequality
Weight: 0.65
, ideology
Weight: 0.64
Siblings liberalism
Weight: 0.35
, racist
Weight: 0.35
, political ideology
Weight: 0.34
, religion
Weight: 0.34
, nationalism
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was in 1930s 1.00
was baned 0.98
was in south 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(racism, was in 1930s)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(racism, was in 1930s)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(racism, was in 1930s)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(racism, was baned)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(racism, was in 1930s)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(racism, was baned)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(racism, was in 1930s)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(racism, was baned)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(racism, was in 1930s)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(racism, was baned)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(racism, was in 1930s)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(racism, was in south)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(racism, was in 1930s)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(racism, was in south)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(racism, was in 1930s)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(racism, was in south)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(racism, was in 1930s)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(racism, was in south)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(racism, was in 1930s)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(racism, was in 1930s)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(racism, was in 1930s)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(racism, was in 1930s)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(racism, was in 1930s)