racism: was in south

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bigotry
Weight: 0.71
, prejudice
Weight: 0.66
, injustice
Weight: 0.65
, inequality
Weight: 0.65
, ideology
Weight: 0.64
Siblings liberalism
Weight: 0.35
, racist
Weight: 0.35
, political ideology
Weight: 0.34
, religion
Weight: 0.34
, nationalism
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was in south 1.00
was in 1930s 0.80
was baned 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(racism, was in south) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(racism, was in south)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(racism, was in south) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(racism, was baned)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(racism, was in south) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(racism, was baned)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(racism, was in south) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(racism, was baned)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(racism, was in south) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(racism, was baned)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(racism, was in south) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(racism, was in 1930s)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(racism, was in south) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(racism, was in 1930s)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(racism, was in south) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(racism, was in 1930s)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(racism, was in south) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(racism, was in 1930s)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(racism, was in south) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(racism, was in south) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(racism, was in south)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(racism, was in south) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(racism, was in south)