rad: is onc competitive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents word
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, tool
Weight: 0.50
, organization
Weight: 0.47
, item
Weight: 0.44
Siblings shit
Weight: 0.33
, fuck
Weight: 0.33
, f word
Weight: 0.33
, jesus christ
Weight: 0.33
, oh
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is onc competitive 1.00
is onc 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(rad, is onc competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(rad, is onc competitive)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rad, is onc competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(rad, is onc)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(rad, is onc competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(rad, is onc)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(rad, is onc competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(rad, is onc)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(rad, is onc competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rad, is onc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(rad, is onc competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rad, is onc competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(rad, is onc competitive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(rad, is onc competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rad, is onc competitive)