radiation: be considered dangerous

Related concepts

Parents	hazard Weight: 0.62 , cause Weight: 0.58 , treatment Weight: 0.57 , force Weight: 0.57 , modality Weight: 0.57
Siblings	gamma radiation Weight: 0.77 , irradiation Weight: 0.33 , air pollution Weight: 0.33 , chemical Weight: 0.33 , smoke Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered dangerous	1.00
be dangerous	0.94
is dangerous	0.93
be dangerous to humans	0.84
is hazardous	0.80
is harmful	0.78
be harmful	0.78
be harmful to things	0.76
be harmful to living	0.76
be hazardous to living organisms	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(hazard, is dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(radiation, be considered dangerous)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(cause, be harmful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(radiation, be considered dangerous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(hazard, is dangerous)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(cause, be harmful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(hazard, is dangerous)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(cause, be harmful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(chemical, be dangerous)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(smoke, be dangerous)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(gamma radiation, is dangerous)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(air pollution, is dangerous)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(gamma radiation, be dangerous to humans)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(air pollution, is harmful)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be harmful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(hazard, is dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(radiation, be considered dangerous)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(cause, be harmful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(radiation, be considered dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(chemical, be dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(chemical, be dangerous)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(smoke, be dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(smoke, be dangerous)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(gamma radiation, is dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(gamma radiation, is dangerous)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(air pollution, is dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(air pollution, is dangerous)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(gamma radiation, be dangerous to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(gamma radiation, be dangerous to humans)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(air pollution, be harmful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(air pollution, be harmful)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(air pollution, is harmful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(air pollution, is harmful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(radiation, be considered dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(radiation, be dangerous)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Salient(radiation, be dangerous)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(radiation, be dangerous)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(radiation, be dangerous)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(radiation, is harmful)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(radiation, is dangerous)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(radiation, is dangerous)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(radiation, is dangerous)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(radiation, is harmful)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(radiation, is dangerous)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(radiation, is harmful)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(radiation, is harmful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(radiation, be considered dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(radiation, be considered dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(hazard, is dangerous)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(cause, be harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(smoke, be dangerous)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(chemical, be dangerous)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(gamma radiation, is dangerous)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(air pollution, is dangerous)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(gamma radiation, be dangerous to humans)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(air pollution, be harmful)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(air pollution, is harmful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(hazard, is dangerous)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(radiation, be considered dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(cause, be harmful)