radiation: be harmful to living things

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.62
, cause
Weight: 0.58
, treatment
Weight: 0.57
, force
Weight: 0.57
, modality
Weight: 0.57
Siblings gamma radiation
Weight: 0.77
, irradiation
Weight: 0.33
, air pollution
Weight: 0.33
, chemical
Weight: 0.33
, smoke
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harmful to living things 1.00
be harmful to living 0.96
harmful living 0.95
be harmful to things 0.93
be harmful 0.87
is harmful 0.86
be harmful to animals 0.84
be harmful to humans 0.84
be hazardous to living organisms 0.84
be harmful to body 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cause, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(radiation, be harmful to living things)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(radiation, be harmful to living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(cause, be harmful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be harmful to living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cause, be harmful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be harmful to living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, is harmful)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be harmful to living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be harmful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cause, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(radiation, be harmful to living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(radiation, be harmful to living things)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(radiation, be harmful to living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(air pollution, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be harmful)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(radiation, be harmful to living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(air pollution, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(air pollution, is harmful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(radiation, be harmful to living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(radiation, be harmful to living things)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(radiation, be harmful to living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be harmful to animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(radiation, be harmful to living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(radiation, be harmful to animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(radiation, be harmful to living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(radiation, is harmful)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(radiation, be harmful to living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(radiation, be harmful to animals)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(radiation, be harmful to living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(radiation, be harmful to animals)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(radiation, be harmful to living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(radiation, is harmful)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(radiation, be harmful to living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(radiation, is harmful)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(radiation, be harmful to living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(radiation, is harmful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(radiation, be harmful to living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(radiation, be harmful to living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be harmful to living things)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(radiation, be harmful to living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(radiation, be harmful to living things)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be harmful to living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(cause, be harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be harmful to living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(air pollution, be harmful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be harmful to living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(air pollution, is harmful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(radiation, be harmful to living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(cause, be harmful)