radiation: be used in energy production

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.62
, cause
Weight: 0.58
, treatment
Weight: 0.57
, force
Weight: 0.57
Siblings gamma radiation
Weight: 0.77
, irradiation
Weight: 0.33
, air pollution
Weight: 0.33
, chemical
Weight: 0.33
, smoke
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in energy production 1.00
is energy 0.82
be produced 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be used in energy production) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(gamma radiation, be produced)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be used in energy production) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chemical, is energy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(radiation, be used in energy production) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(chemical, is energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(chemical, is energy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(radiation, be used in energy production) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(gamma radiation, be produced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(gamma radiation, be produced)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(radiation, be used in energy production) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(radiation, be used in energy production)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(radiation, be used in energy production) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(radiation, is energy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(radiation, be used in energy production) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(radiation, is energy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(radiation, be used in energy production) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(radiation, is energy)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(radiation, be used in energy production) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(radiation, is energy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(radiation, be used in energy production) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(radiation, be used in energy production) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be used in energy production)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(radiation, be used in energy production) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(radiation, be used in energy production)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be used in energy production) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(chemical, is energy)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be used in energy production) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(gamma radiation, be produced)