radiation: has color green

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.62
, cause
Weight: 0.58
, treatment
Weight: 0.57
, force
Weight: 0.57
Siblings gamma radiation
Weight: 0.77
, irradiation
Weight: 0.33
, air pollution
Weight: 0.33
, chemical
Weight: 0.33
, smoke
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has color green 1.00
has color blue 0.90
be depicted as green 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(radiation, has color green)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(smoke, has color green)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(radiation, has color green)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(smoke, has color blue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(radiation, has color green)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(smoke, has color green)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(smoke, has color green)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(radiation, has color green)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(smoke, has color blue)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(smoke, has color blue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(radiation, has color green)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(radiation, has color green)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(radiation, has color green)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(radiation, be depicted as green)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(radiation, has color green)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be depicted as green)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(radiation, has color green)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(radiation, be depicted as green)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(radiation, has color green)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(radiation, be depicted as green)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(radiation, has color green)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(radiation, has color blue)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(radiation, has color green)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(radiation, has color blue)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(radiation, has color green)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(radiation, has color blue)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(radiation, has color green)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(radiation, has color blue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(radiation, has color green)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(radiation, has color green)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(radiation, has color green)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(radiation, has color green)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(radiation, has color green)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(radiation, has color green)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(smoke, has color green)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(radiation, has color green)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(smoke, has color blue)