radiation: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.62
, cause
Weight: 0.58
, treatment
Weight: 0.57
, force
Weight: 0.57
Siblings gamma radiation
Weight: 0.77
, irradiation
Weight: 0.33
, air pollution
Weight: 0.33
, chemical
Weight: 0.33
, smoke
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
be bad for people 0.80
be good for use 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(radiation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(gamma radiation, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(radiation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(irradiation, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(radiation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(gamma radiation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(gamma radiation, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(radiation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(irradiation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(irradiation, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(radiation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(radiation, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(radiation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(radiation, be bad for people)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(radiation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(radiation, be bad for people)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(radiation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be bad for people)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(radiation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(radiation, be good for use)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(radiation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(radiation, be bad for people)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(radiation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(radiation, be good for use)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(radiation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(radiation, be good for use)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(radiation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be good for use)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(radiation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(radiation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(radiation, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(radiation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(radiation, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(radiation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(gamma radiation, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(radiation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(irradiation, has quality bad)