radiation: is harmful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.62
, cause
Weight: 0.58
, treatment
Weight: 0.57
, force
Weight: 0.57
, modality
Weight: 0.57
Siblings gamma radiation
Weight: 0.77
, irradiation
Weight: 0.33
, air pollution
Weight: 0.33
, chemical
Weight: 0.33
, smoke
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is harmful 1.00
be harmful 0.99
be harmful to things 0.93
be harmful to body 0.91
be harmful to humans 0.91
be harmful to living 0.90
harmful living 0.90
be harmful to animals 0.89
be harmful to systems 0.89
be harmful to plants 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cause, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(radiation, is harmful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(cause, be harmful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cause, be harmful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, is harmful)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be harmful)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(smoke, be harmful to plants)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cause, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(radiation, is harmful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(air pollution, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(air pollution, is harmful)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(air pollution, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be harmful)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(smoke, be harmful to plants)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(smoke, be harmful to plants)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(radiation, is harmful)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be harmful to animals)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(radiation, be harmful to plants)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(radiation, be harmful to plants)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(radiation, be harmful to animals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(radiation, be harmful to plants)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(radiation, be harmful to animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(radiation, be harmful to plants)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(radiation, be harmful to animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(radiation, is harmful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(radiation, is harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(cause, be harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(smoke, be harmful to plants)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(air pollution, be harmful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(air pollution, is harmful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(radiation, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(cause, be harmful)