radiator: be cold in middle

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cooling device
Weight: 0.68
, heating element
Weight: 0.62
, heater
Weight: 0.56
, application
Weight: 0.55
, unit
Weight: 0.54
Siblings hose
Weight: 0.54
, heat sink
Weight: 0.34
, electric heater
Weight: 0.33
, compressor
Weight: 0.33
, heat
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cold in middle 1.00
is cold 0.88
be cold at top 0.85
be cold at bottom 0.84
be warm at bottom 0.78
be warm at top 0.77
is warm 0.76
be warm at top at bottom 0.76
come when heating is off 0.75
is when heating is off 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(radiator, be cold in middle)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(radiator, is cold)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(radiator, be cold at bottom)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(radiator, be cold at bottom)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(radiator, be cold at bottom)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(radiator, be cold at top)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(radiator, be cold at top)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be cold at bottom)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(radiator, be cold at top)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(radiator, be warm at bottom)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(radiator, be warm at bottom)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(radiator, be warm at bottom)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be warm at bottom)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(radiator, be warm at top)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be cold at top)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(radiator, be warm at top at bottom)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(radiator, be warm at top at bottom)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(radiator, be warm at top)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be warm at top at bottom)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(radiator, be warm at top at bottom)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(radiator, be warm at top)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be warm at top)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(radiator, is cold)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(radiator, is warm)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(radiator, is cold)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(radiator, is warm)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(radiator, come when heating is off)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(radiator, is when heating is off)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(radiator, is warm)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(radiator, is warm)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(radiator, come when heating is off)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(radiator, is when heating is off)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(radiator, come when heating is off)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(radiator, is when heating is off)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(radiator, come when heating is off)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(radiator, is cold)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(radiator, is when heating is off)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be cold in middle)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(radiator, be cold in middle)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(radiator, be cold in middle)