radio station: power down at night

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents television station
Weight: 0.88
, radio
Weight: 0.80
, channel
Weight: 0.74
, station
Weight: 0.71
Siblings broadcast
Weight: 0.67
, billboard
Weight: 0.59
, abc
Weight: 0.58
, am
Weight: 0.54
, cbc
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
power down at night 1.00
lower power at night 0.92
reduce power at night 0.88
is down 0.82
come at night 0.80
be stronger at night 0.76
were set up in late 1950s 0.76
am is better at night 0.76
is one going off air 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(station, were set up in late 1950s)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(radio station, power down at night)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(radio, am is better at night)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(radio station, power down at night)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(channel, is one going off air)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(radio station, power down at night)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(channel, is one going off air)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(radio, am is better at night)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(station, were set up in late 1950s)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(radio, am is better at night)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(station, were set up in late 1950s)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(channel, is one going off air)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(billboard, is down)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(station, were set up in late 1950s)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(radio station, power down at night)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(radio, am is better at night)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(radio station, power down at night)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(channel, is one going off air)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(radio station, power down at night)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(billboard, is down)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(billboard, is down)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(radio station, power down at night)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(radio station, reduce power at night)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(radio station, reduce power at night)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(radio station, lower power at night)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(radio station, reduce power at night)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(radio station, lower power at night)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(radio station, lower power at night)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(radio station, lower power at night)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(radio station, reduce power at night)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(radio station, come at night)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(radio station, come at night)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(radio station, be stronger at night)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(radio station, be stronger at night)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(radio station, come at night)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(radio station, come at night)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(radio station, be stronger at night)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(radio station, be stronger at night)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(radio station, power down at night)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(radio station, power down at night)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(channel, is one going off air)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(radio, am is better at night)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(station, were set up in late 1950s)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(billboard, is down)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(channel, is one going off air)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(radio, am is better at night)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(radio station, power down at night)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(station, were set up in late 1950s)