radio studio: be at office build

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at office build 1.00
be a part of office build 0.97
be at build 0.87
be at national press build 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(radio studio, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(radio studio, be at office build)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(radio studio, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(radio studio, be a part of office build)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(radio studio, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(radio studio, be a part of office build)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(radio studio, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(radio studio, be at build)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(radio studio, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(radio studio, be at national press build)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(radio studio, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(radio studio, be at build)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(radio studio, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(radio studio, be at national press build)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(radio studio, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(radio studio, be a part of office build)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(radio studio, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(radio studio, be at build)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(radio studio, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(radio studio, be at build)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(radio studio, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(radio studio, be at national press build)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(radio studio, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(radio studio, be at national press build)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(radio studio, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(radio studio, be a part of office build)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(radio studio, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(radio studio, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(radio studio, be at office build)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(radio studio, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(radio studio, be at office build)