radio telescope: be alike

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.63
, technology
Weight: 0.58
, device
Weight: 0.52
, method
Weight: 0.43
Siblings telescope
Weight: 0.39
, radio receiver
Weight: 0.34
, debt instrument
Weight: 0.34
, magnetic compass
Weight: 0.34
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be alike 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(technology, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be alike)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(radio telescope, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(technology, be alike)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(technology, be alike)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be alike)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(technology, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(radio telescope, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be alike)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(radio telescope, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(telescope, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(telescope, be alike)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(radio telescope, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be alike)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(radio telescope, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be alike)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(radio telescope, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be alike)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(technology, be alike)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(telescope, be alike)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(radio telescope, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(technology, be alike)