radio telescope: be better than optical

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.63
, technology
Weight: 0.58
, device
Weight: 0.52
, method
Weight: 0.43
Siblings telescope
Weight: 0.39
, radio receiver
Weight: 0.34
, debt instrument
Weight: 0.34
, magnetic compass
Weight: 0.34
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than optical 1.00
be better than optical telescopes 0.90
be bigger than optical telescopes 0.89
need larger than optical telescopes 0.89
have larger than optical telescopes 0.89
use than optical telescopes 0.88
differ from optical telescopes 0.85
be better than telescopes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be better than optical)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(radio telescope, use than optical telescopes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(radio telescope, differ from optical telescopes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, use than optical telescopes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, differ from optical telescopes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be bigger than optical telescopes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be better than optical telescopes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, have larger than optical telescopes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, need larger than optical telescopes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(radio telescope, use than optical telescopes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(radio telescope, differ from optical telescopes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, use than optical telescopes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, differ from optical telescopes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(radio telescope, need larger than optical telescopes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be better than telescopes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(radio telescope, have larger than optical telescopes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, need larger than optical telescopes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(radio telescope, need larger than optical telescopes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(radio telescope, have larger than optical telescopes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, have larger than optical telescopes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be better than optical telescopes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be bigger than optical telescopes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be better than optical telescopes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be better than telescopes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be bigger than optical telescopes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be better than optical telescopes)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be better than telescopes)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be bigger than optical telescopes)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be better than telescopes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be better than optical)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(radio telescope, be better than optical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be better than optical)