radio telescope: be different from keck telescopes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.63
, technology
Weight: 0.58
, device
Weight: 0.52
, method
Weight: 0.43
Siblings telescope
Weight: 0.39
, radio receiver
Weight: 0.34
, debt instrument
Weight: 0.34
, magnetic compass
Weight: 0.34
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from keck telescopes 1.00
use than telescopes 0.97
be better than telescopes 0.97
be considered telescopes 0.96
differ from telescopes 0.96
be bigger than telescopes 0.95
differ from optical telescopes 0.92
be better than optical telescopes 0.92
use than optical telescopes 0.92
have larger than optical telescopes 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(radio telescope, use than telescopes)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(radio telescope, differ from telescopes)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, use than telescopes)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be considered telescopes)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, differ from telescopes)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be considered telescopes)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(radio telescope, differ from optical telescopes)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(radio telescope, use than optical telescopes)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be better than telescopes)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, differ from optical telescopes)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, use than optical telescopes)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be bigger than telescopes)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, have larger than optical telescopes)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be better than optical telescopes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(radio telescope, have larger than optical telescopes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be better than telescopes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(radio telescope, differ from telescopes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(radio telescope, use than telescopes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be better than optical telescopes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(radio telescope, differ from optical telescopes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be bigger than telescopes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(radio telescope, use than optical telescopes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be considered telescopes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(radio telescope, have larger than optical telescopes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be better than telescopes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be bigger than telescopes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be bigger than telescopes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be better than optical telescopes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be better than telescopes)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be better than optical telescopes)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be considered telescopes)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, have larger than optical telescopes)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, differ from telescopes)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, use than telescopes)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, differ from optical telescopes)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, use than optical telescopes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)