radio telescope: be important in astronomy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.63
, technology
Weight: 0.58
, device
Weight: 0.52
, method
Weight: 0.43
Siblings telescope
Weight: 0.39
, radio receiver
Weight: 0.34
, debt instrument
Weight: 0.34
, magnetic compass
Weight: 0.34
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in astronomy 1.00
be useful in astronomy 0.97
be useful in modern astronomy 0.95
be considered telescopes 0.80
be different from keck telescopes 0.80
be used by astronomers 0.79
use than telescopes 0.78
be better than telescopes 0.78
be bigger than telescopes 0.78
use than optical telescopes 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be important in astronomy)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be useful in astronomy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(telescope, be important in astronomy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(telescope, be useful in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(telescope, be useful in astronomy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be useful in astronomy)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be useful in astronomy)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be useful in astronomy)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be considered telescopes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be used by astronomers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be considered telescopes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be used by astronomers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(radio telescope, use than telescopes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be used by astronomers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(radio telescope, use than telescopes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be better than telescopes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be better than telescopes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(radio telescope, use than optical telescopes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be bigger than telescopes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be bigger than telescopes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be considered telescopes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(radio telescope, use than optical telescopes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, use than optical telescopes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, use than telescopes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be better than telescopes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be bigger than telescopes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be useful in astronomy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be bigger than telescopes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be better than telescopes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be used by astronomers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be considered telescopes)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, use than telescopes)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, use than optical telescopes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(telescope, be useful in astronomy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(telescope, be important in astronomy)