radio telescope: have bad angular resolution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.63
, technology
Weight: 0.58
, device
Weight: 0.52
, method
Weight: 0.43
Siblings telescope
Weight: 0.39
, radio receiver
Weight: 0.34
, debt instrument
Weight: 0.34
, magnetic compass
Weight: 0.34
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bad angular resolution 1.00
have angular resolution 0.99
have bad resolution 0.85
have resolution 0.83
have poor resolution 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(radio telescope, have bad angular resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(radio telescope, have bad angular resolution)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(radio telescope, have bad angular resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, have angular resolution)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(radio telescope, have bad angular resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(radio telescope, have angular resolution)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(radio telescope, have bad angular resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, have bad resolution)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(radio telescope, have bad angular resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, have resolution)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(radio telescope, have bad angular resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, have poor resolution)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(radio telescope, have bad angular resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(radio telescope, have resolution)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(radio telescope, have bad angular resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(radio telescope, have bad resolution)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(radio telescope, have bad angular resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(radio telescope, have poor resolution)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(radio telescope, have bad angular resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(radio telescope, have angular resolution)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(radio telescope, have bad angular resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, have bad resolution)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(radio telescope, have bad angular resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(radio telescope, have bad resolution)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(radio telescope, have bad angular resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, have poor resolution)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(radio telescope, have bad angular resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(radio telescope, have poor resolution)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(radio telescope, have bad angular resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(radio telescope, have resolution)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(radio telescope, have bad angular resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, have angular resolution)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(radio telescope, have bad angular resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, have resolution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(radio telescope, have bad angular resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(radio telescope, have bad angular resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, have bad angular resolution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(radio telescope, have bad angular resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(radio telescope, have bad angular resolution)