radio telescope: have relatively poor power

Property	Similarity
have relatively poor power	1.00
have poor power	0.90
have relatively poor resolving power	0.88
have power	0.80
have very large	0.77
have poor resolving power	0.77
need very large	0.76

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(radio telescope, have relatively poor power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(radio telescope, have poor power)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(radio telescope, have relatively poor power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(radio telescope, have power)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(radio telescope, have relatively poor power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(radio telescope, have relatively poor resolving power)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(radio telescope, have relatively poor power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(radio telescope, have poor power)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(radio telescope, have relatively poor power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(radio telescope, have poor power)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(radio telescope, have relatively poor power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(radio telescope, have power)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(radio telescope, have relatively poor power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(radio telescope, have power)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(radio telescope, have relatively poor power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, have poor power)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(radio telescope, have relatively poor power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(radio telescope, have relatively poor resolving power)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(radio telescope, have relatively poor power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, have relatively poor resolving power)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(radio telescope, have relatively poor power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(radio telescope, have poor resolving power)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(radio telescope, have relatively poor power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(radio telescope, have very large)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(radio telescope, have relatively poor power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Plausible(radio telescope, have relatively poor resolving power)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(radio telescope, have relatively poor power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(radio telescope, need very large)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(radio telescope, have relatively poor power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(radio telescope, have very large)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(radio telescope, have relatively poor power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(radio telescope, have poor resolving power)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(radio telescope, have relatively poor power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, have poor resolving power)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(radio telescope, have relatively poor power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(radio telescope, have very large)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(radio telescope, have relatively poor power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(radio telescope, need very large)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(radio telescope, have relatively poor power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Plausible(radio telescope, have poor resolving power)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(radio telescope, have relatively poor power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Salient(radio telescope, need very large)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(radio telescope, have relatively poor power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, have very large)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(radio telescope, have relatively poor power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, need very large)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(radio telescope, have relatively poor power) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, have power)

Parents	instrument Weight: 0.63 , technology Weight: 0.58 , device Weight: 0.52 , method Weight: 0.43
Siblings	telescope Weight: 0.39 , radio receiver Weight: 0.34 , debt instrument Weight: 0.34 , magnetic compass Weight: 0.34 , musical instrument Weight: 0.33

radio telescope: have relatively poor power

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible