radio: am is better at night

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents radio station
Weight: 0.72
, broadcast
Weight: 0.69
, television
Weight: 0.68
, show
Weight: 0.65
, network
Weight: 0.62
Siblings television station
Weight: 0.42
, television show
Weight: 0.36
, television series
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
am is better at night 1.00
is am bad 0.91
is am used 0.90
is am quality 0.90
am keep working after noon 0.90
is am bad quality 0.90
is am talk 0.89
is am terrible 0.89
am sound like am radio 0.88
am keep working 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(radio, am is better at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(radio, am is better at night)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(radio, am is better at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(radio, is am used)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(radio, am is better at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(radio, is am talk)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(radio, am is better at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(radio, is am used)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(radio, am is better at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(radio, is am talk)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(radio, am is better at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(radio, is am bad quality)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(radio, am is better at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(radio, is am used)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(radio, am is better at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(radio, is am talk)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(radio, am is better at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(radio, is am bad quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(radio, am is better at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(radio, is am bad quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(radio, am is better at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(radio, is am bad quality)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(radio, am is better at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(radio, is am used)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(radio, am is better at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(radio, is am talk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(radio, am is better at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(radio, am is better at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(radio, am is better at night)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(radio, am is better at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(radio, am is better at night)