radio: am is more susceptible to noise

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents radio station
Weight: 0.72
, broadcast
Weight: 0.69
, television
Weight: 0.68
, show
Weight: 0.65
, network
Weight: 0.62
Siblings television station
Weight: 0.42
, television show
Weight: 0.36
, television series
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
am is more susceptible to noise 1.00
am sound like am radio 0.80
is am used 0.79
am sound like shit 0.79
is am static 0.78
am differ in sense of waves 0.78
am sound like radio 0.78
is am bad quality 0.78
is am bad 0.78
is am quality 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(radio, am is more susceptible to noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(radio, am is more susceptible to noise)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(radio, am is more susceptible to noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(radio, is am used)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(radio, am is more susceptible to noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(radio, am differ in sense of waves)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(radio, am is more susceptible to noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(radio, is am used)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(radio, am is more susceptible to noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(radio, is am bad quality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(radio, am is more susceptible to noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(radio, am differ in sense of waves)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(radio, am is more susceptible to noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(radio, is am used)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(radio, am is more susceptible to noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(radio, am differ in sense of waves)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(radio, am is more susceptible to noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(radio, is am used)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(radio, am is more susceptible to noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(radio, am differ in sense of waves)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(radio, am is more susceptible to noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(radio, is am bad quality)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(radio, am is more susceptible to noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(radio, is am bad quality)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(radio, am is more susceptible to noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(radio, is am bad quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(radio, am is more susceptible to noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(radio, am is more susceptible to noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(radio, am is more susceptible to noise)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(radio, am is more susceptible to noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(radio, am is more susceptible to noise)