radio: be good for advertising

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents radio station
Weight: 0.72
, broadcast
Weight: 0.69
, television
Weight: 0.68
, show
Weight: 0.65
, network
Weight: 0.62
Siblings television station
Weight: 0.42
, television show
Weight: 0.36
, television series
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for advertising 1.00
be important in advertising 0.96
advertising 0.95
is effective advertising 0.92
be used in marketing 0.79
have marketing 0.79
have commercials at time 0.78
have commercials at same time 0.78
play commercials at time 0.77
play commercials at same time 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(radio station, have commercials at same time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(radio, be good for advertising)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(radio station, play commercials at same time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(radio, be good for advertising)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(network, be used in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(radio, be good for advertising)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(network, be used in marketing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(radio station, have commercials at same time)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(radio station, play commercials at same time)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(radio station, play commercials at same time)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(radio station, have commercials at same time)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(network, be used in marketing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(radio station, have commercials at same time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(radio, be good for advertising)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(radio station, play commercials at same time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(radio, be good for advertising)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(network, be used in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(radio, be good for advertising)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(radio, be good for advertising)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(radio, advertising)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(radio, be important in advertising)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(radio, be important in advertising)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(radio, advertising)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(radio, advertising)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(radio, be important in advertising)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(radio, is effective advertising)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(radio, is effective advertising)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(radio, is effective advertising)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(radio, be important in advertising)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(radio, is effective advertising)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(radio, advertising)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(radio, be good for advertising)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(radio, be good for advertising)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(network, be used in marketing)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(radio station, have commercials at same time)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(radio station, play commercials at same time)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(network, be used in marketing)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(radio station, have commercials at same time)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(radio, be good for advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(radio station, play commercials at same time)