radish: be good for us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vegetable
Weight: 0.74
, dish
Weight: 0.62
, species
Weight: 0.59
, plant
Weight: 0.58
, food
Weight: 0.57
Siblings tomato sauce
Weight: 0.39
, eggplant
Weight: 0.39
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.39
, kale
Weight: 0.39
, parsley
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for us 1.00
has quality good 0.80
be good for body 0.78
be good for health 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(radish, be good for us)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(vegetable, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(radish, be good for us)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(species, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(radish, be good for us)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(vegetable, be good for body)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(radish, be good for us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(vegetable, be good for body)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(species, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(vegetable, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be good for body)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(species, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(kale, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(radish, be good for us)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(vegetable, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(radish, be good for us)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(species, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(radish, be good for us)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(vegetable, be good for body)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(radish, be good for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(kale, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(kale, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cauliflower, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(radish, be good for us)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(radish, be good for body)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(radish, be good for health)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(radish, be good for body)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(radish, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(radish, be good for body)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(radish, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(radish, be good for health)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(radish, be good for body)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(radish, be good for health)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(radish, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(radish, be good for health)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(radish, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(radish, be good for us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(radish, be good for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(vegetable, be good for body)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(species, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(kale, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cauliflower, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(vegetable, be good for body)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(species, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)