radon: be dangerous to humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gas
Weight: 0.64
, chemical
Weight: 0.62
, noble gas
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.52
Siblings arsenic
Weight: 0.36
, benzene
Weight: 0.35
, asbestos
Weight: 0.35
, sodium nitrate
Weight: 0.35
, ammonium nitrate
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dangerous to humans 1.00
be harmful to humans 0.92
is dangerous 0.88
be more dangerous than thoron 0.81
is harmful 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(gas, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(radon, be dangerous to humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(gas, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(gas, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(arsenic, be dangerous to humans)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, be harmful to humans)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, is dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ammonium nitrate, is dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(arsenic, is dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(arsenic, is harmful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, is harmful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(gas, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(radon, be dangerous to humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(arsenic, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(arsenic, be dangerous to humans)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(asbestos, be harmful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(asbestos, be harmful to humans)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(arsenic, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(arsenic, is dangerous)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ammonium nitrate, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(ammonium nitrate, is dangerous)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(asbestos, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(asbestos, is dangerous)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(asbestos, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(asbestos, is harmful)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(arsenic, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(arsenic, is harmful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(radon, be dangerous to humans)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(radon, be harmful to humans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(radon, be harmful to humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(radon, is dangerous)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(radon, be harmful to humans)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(radon, is dangerous)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(radon, be more dangerous than thoron)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(radon, is dangerous)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(radon, be more dangerous than thoron)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(radon, is harmful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(radon, be more dangerous than thoron)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(radon, be more dangerous than thoron)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(radon, be harmful to humans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(radon, is harmful)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(radon, is harmful)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(radon, is dangerous)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(radon, is harmful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radon, be dangerous to humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(radon, be dangerous to humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(gas, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(asbestos, is harmful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(asbestos, be harmful to humans)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ammonium nitrate, is dangerous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(arsenic, is harmful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(arsenic, be dangerous to humans)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(arsenic, is dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(asbestos, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(radon, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(gas, is dangerous)