radon: be problem in illinois

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gas
Weight: 0.64
, chemical
Weight: 0.62
, noble gas
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.52
Siblings arsenic
Weight: 0.36
, benzene
Weight: 0.35
, asbestos
Weight: 0.35
, sodium nitrate
Weight: 0.35
, ammonium nitrate
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in illinois 1.00
has state problem 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(radon, be problem in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(arsenic, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(radon, be problem in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(radon, be problem in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(asbestos, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(asbestos, has state problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(radon, be problem in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(arsenic, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(arsenic, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(radon, be problem in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(radon, be problem in illinois)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(radon, be problem in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(radon, has state problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(radon, be problem in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(radon, has state problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(radon, be problem in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(radon, has state problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(radon, be problem in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(radon, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(radon, be problem in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(radon, be problem in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(radon, be problem in illinois)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(radon, be problem in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(radon, be problem in illinois)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(radon, be problem in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(asbestos, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(radon, be problem in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(arsenic, has state problem)