rail: be considered more efficient roads

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.64
, service
Weight: 0.60
, platform
Weight: 0.59
, sector
Weight: 0.58
, utility
Weight: 0.57
Siblings streetcar
Weight: 0.36
, tunnel
Weight: 0.34
, public transport
Weight: 0.34
, postal service
Weight: 0.34
, highway
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered more efficient roads 1.00
be considered efficient roads 0.99
be considered more efficient paved roads 0.93
be considered efficient paved roads 0.91
be considered roads 0.90
be like roads 0.87
drive more efficient 0.84
be considered paved roads 0.83
be called highways 0.83
be more efficient than truck 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(highway, drive more efficient)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(highway, be called highways)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(highway, be called highways)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(highway, be called highways)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(highway, drive more efficient)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(highway, drive more efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(rail, be considered more efficient roads)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(rail, be considered roads)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rail, be considered efficient roads)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(rail, be more efficient than truck)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(rail, be more efficient than truck)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(rail, be considered paved roads)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered more efficient paved roads)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(rail, be considered paved roads)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(rail, be considered more efficient paved roads)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(rail, be considered roads)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(rail, be more efficient than truck)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(rail, be considered more efficient paved roads)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(rail, be considered paved roads)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(rail, be more efficient than truck)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(rail, be considered roads)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered paved roads)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(rail, be considered more efficient paved roads)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rail, be considered efficient paved roads)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(rail, be considered efficient roads)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered efficient paved roads)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(rail, be considered efficient paved roads)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(rail, be considered efficient paved roads)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(rail, be considered efficient roads)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered efficient roads)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered roads)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered more efficient roads)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(rail, be considered more efficient roads)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(highway, be called highways)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(rail, be considered more efficient roads)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(highway, drive more efficient)