rail: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.64
, service
Weight: 0.60
, platform
Weight: 0.59
, sector
Weight: 0.58
, utility
Weight: 0.57
Siblings streetcar
Weight: 0.36
, tunnel
Weight: 0.34
, public transport
Weight: 0.34
, postal service
Weight: 0.34
, highway
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is quality 0.87
be bad in bulgaria 0.87
has quality system 0.82
has quality news 0.80
be bad for environment 0.80
be bad in us 0.80
affect water quality 0.78
hurt bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(rail, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(rail, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(rail, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(rail, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(rail, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(rail, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(project, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(project, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(service, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality news)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(highway, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(highway, affect water quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, hurt bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(streetcar, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(highway, has quality system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rail, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rail, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rail, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rail, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rail, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rail, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(highway, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(highway, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(streetcar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(streetcar, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(highway, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(highway, has quality system)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(highway, affect water quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(highway, affect water quality)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad in us)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(tunnel, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(tunnel, hurt bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(rail, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(rail, has quality good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rail, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rail, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(rail, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality news)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(highway, affect water quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(highway, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in us)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(highway, has quality system)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tunnel, hurt bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(streetcar, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(rail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality news)