rail: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.64
, service
Weight: 0.60
, platform
Weight: 0.59
, sector
Weight: 0.58
, utility
Weight: 0.57
Siblings streetcar
Weight: 0.36
, tunnel
Weight: 0.34
, public transport
Weight: 0.34
, postal service
Weight: 0.34
, highway
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
has quality system 0.84
has quality news 0.79
affect water quality 0.79
be bad in bulgaria 0.77
be bad for environment 0.77
be bad in us 0.76
be better for environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rail, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rail, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rail, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rail, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rail, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rail, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(project, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(project, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(service, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality news)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(highway, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(highway, affect water quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(streetcar, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(highway, has quality system)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rail, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rail, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rail, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rail, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rail, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rail, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(streetcar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(streetcar, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(highway, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(highway, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(highway, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(highway, has quality system)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(highway, affect water quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(highway, affect water quality)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(public transport, be better for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad in us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(rail, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(rail, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rail, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(rail, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rail, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality news)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(highway, affect water quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(highway, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(highway, has quality system)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in us)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(public transport, be better for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(streetcar, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality news)