rally: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	event Weight: 0.67 , action Weight: 0.62 , activity Weight: 0.57 , gathering Weight: 0.56
Siblings	march Weight: 0.36 , parade Weight: 0.34 , demonstration Weight: 0.34 , national convention Weight: 0.33 , memorial day Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality bad	0.96
has quality wrong	0.85
has quality worth	0.85
CAN good	0.81
affect water quality	0.79
has quality wheels	0.76
improve performance	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(gathering, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(rally, has quality good)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(rally, has quality good)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(rally, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality bad)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(demonstration, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(demonstration, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(gathering, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(rally, has quality good)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(rally, has quality good)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(rally, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(demonstration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(demonstration, has quality good)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(demonstration, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(demonstration, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(rally, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(rally, has quality bad)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality bad)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(rally, has quality bad)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(rally, has quality bad)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(rally, has quality wheels)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(rally, has quality wheels)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality wheels)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(rally, has quality wheels)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(rally, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(gathering, has quality worth)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(gathering, has quality wrong)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(gathering, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(demonstration, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(demonstration, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(gathering, has quality bad)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(gathering, has quality worth)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(rally, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(gathering, has quality wrong)