ram: be important to computer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weapon
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, animal
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.55
Siblings aries
Weight: 0.39
, badger
Weight: 0.33
, assault rifle
Weight: 0.32
, elephant seal
Weight: 0.32
, submachine gun
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to computer 1.00
be in computer 0.95
be in computer work 0.93
be used in computer 0.93
be needed in computer 0.92
be required in computer 0.89
be important in laptop 0.86
make computer faster 0.85
affect performance of computer 0.85
affects computer performance 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(ram, be important to computer)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(ram, be in computer)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(ram, be in computer)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(ram, be in computer)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(ram, be used in computer)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(ram, be used in computer)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ram, be used in computer)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(ram, be needed in computer)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(ram, be needed in computer)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(ram, be needed in computer)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(ram, be required in computer)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(ram, be required in computer)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(ram, be in computer)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ram, be required in computer)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(ram, affect performance of computer)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(ram, affect performance of computer)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(ram, affect performance of computer)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(ram, be used in computer)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(ram, affects computer performance)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(ram, affects computer performance)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ram, affects computer performance)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(ram, be needed in computer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(ram, be required in computer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(ram, affect performance of computer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(ram, affects computer performance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(ram, be important to computer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ram, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ram, be important to computer)