ram: be more expensive in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weapon
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, animal
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.55
Siblings aries
Weight: 0.39
, badger
Weight: 0.33
, assault rifle
Weight: 0.32
, elephant seal
Weight: 0.32
, submachine gun
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive in canada 1.00
be more expensive than ssd 0.85
be more expensive as 4x4 0.80
be more expensive than 2x8 0.80
get more expensive 0.80
is more expensive 0.79
get expensive 0.77
be more expensive than drive 0.77
is more expensive now 0.77
is expensive 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, get more expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(ram, be more expensive in canada)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(ram, be more expensive in canada)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(ram, be more expensive in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, get more expensive)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(thing, get more expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, get more expensive)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(ram, be more expensive in canada)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(ram, be more expensive in canada)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(ram, be more expensive in canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(ram, be more expensive in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(ram, be more expensive than ssd)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(ram, get expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(ram, be more expensive than ssd)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ram, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(ram, be more expensive than ssd)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(ram, get expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ram, be more expensive than ssd)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ram, get expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ram, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ram, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(ram, get expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ram, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(ram, be more expensive in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(ram, be more expensive in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, get more expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, get more expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(ram, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)