ramen: be used as example of cheap food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.47
, chinese food
Weight: 0.45
, noodle
Weight: 0.42
, soup
Weight: 0.39
, staple
Weight: 0.37
Siblings sushi
Weight: 0.33
, dumpling
Weight: 0.33
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.32
, burrito
Weight: 0.32
, potato salad
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used as example of cheap food 1.00
be used as example of food 0.95
be used as example 0.89
be cheap 0.85
is cheap 0.85
is popular food 0.79
is food 0.78
be main type of food 0.77
is staple foods of china 0.76
is traditional food 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(noodle, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(noodle, be main type of food)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(noodle, is staple foods of china)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(staple, is food)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(soup, is food)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(soup, is food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(staple, is food)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(noodle, is staple foods of china)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(noodle, be main type of food)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(noodle, is cheap)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(chinese food, is cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is cheap)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(noodle, is cheap)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(noodle, is staple foods of china)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be main type of food)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(staple, is food)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(soup, is food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sushi, is cheap)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(dumpling, is popular food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sushi, is food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(dumpling, is food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(noodle, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(noodle, be main type of food)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(noodle, is staple foods of china)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(staple, is food)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(soup, is food)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(dumpling, is food)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(dumpling, is food)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(sushi, is food)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(sushi, is food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(sushi, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sushi, is cheap)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(dumpling, is popular food)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(dumpling, is popular food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(ramen, be used as example of food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ramen, be used as example of food)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(ramen, be used as example of food)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(ramen, be used as example)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(ramen, be used as example)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(ramen, be used as example)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(ramen, be used as example)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of food)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(ramen, be cheap)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ramen, be cheap)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ramen, is cheap)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ramen, is cheap)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(ramen, be cheap)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ramen, is cheap)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(ramen, be cheap)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(ramen, is cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(soup, is food)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(staple, is food)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(noodle, is cheap)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(chinese food, is cheap)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(noodle, be main type of food)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(noodle, is staple foods of china)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(dumpling, is food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(sushi, is food)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sushi, is cheap)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(dumpling, is popular food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(soup, is food)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(staple, is food)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(noodle, be main type of food)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(noodle, is cheap)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(chinese food, is cheap)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ramen, be used as example of cheap food)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(noodle, is staple foods of china)