ramen: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.47
, chinese food
Weight: 0.45
, noodle
Weight: 0.42
, soup
Weight: 0.39
, staple
Weight: 0.37
Siblings sushi
Weight: 0.33
, dumpling
Weight: 0.33
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.32
, burrito
Weight: 0.32
, potato salad
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
is great 0.81
taste good 0.79
be bad for health 0.77
has quality advantage 0.77
be bad for environment 0.77
is best 0.76
has quality rewards 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(noodle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ramen, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(soup, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ramen, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(soup, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ramen, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(chinese food, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ramen, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ramen, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ramen, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(staple, has quality rewards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ramen, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(chinese food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ramen, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ramen, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ramen, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(staple, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ramen, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ramen, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(soup, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(dish, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(noodle, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(noodle, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(chinese food, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(noodle, be bad for health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(chinese food, is great)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(soup, is great)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(staple, has quality advantage)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(noodle, taste good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(staple, has quality rewards)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dish, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(soup, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(soup, is great)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is great)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is quality)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(staple, has quality rewards)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(staple, has quality advantage)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(sushi, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(burrito, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(sushi, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dumpling, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sushi, is best)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(dumpling, taste good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(noodle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ramen, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(soup, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ramen, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ramen, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ramen, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(soup, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ramen, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(chinese food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ramen, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ramen, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(chinese food, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ramen, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(noodle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ramen, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(staple, has quality rewards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ramen, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(staple, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ramen, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(noodle, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ramen, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(dumpling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(dumpling, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(sushi, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(sushi, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(burrito, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(burrito, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(potato salad, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(dumpling, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(dumpling, taste good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(sushi, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(sushi, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(sushi, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(sushi, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(ramen, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(ramen, is best)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ramen, is best)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(ramen, is best)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ramen, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ramen, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(chinese food, is quality)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(staple, has quality advantage)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(noodle, be bad for health)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(noodle, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chinese food, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(soup, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(staple, has quality rewards)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(noodle, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(noodle, taste good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chinese food, is great)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(soup, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(sushi, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(dumpling, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sushi, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(burrito, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(potato salad, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dumpling, taste good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(sushi, is best)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(soup, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(noodle, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(noodle, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chinese food, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(chinese food, is quality)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chinese food, is great)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(soup, is great)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(staple, has quality advantage)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(noodle, be bad for health)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(noodle, taste good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(ramen, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(staple, has quality rewards)