ranch: be good on everything

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, horse
Weight: 0.57
, farm
Weight: 0.55
Siblings matador
Weight: 0.40
, mustang
Weight: 0.33
, campsite
Weight: 0.33
, rodeo
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good on everything 1.00
make about just everything taste better 0.90
make about everything taste better 0.88
make about just everything taste 0.88
make about everything taste 0.86
has quality good 0.78
dress damn good 0.78
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(farm, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(ranch, be good on everything)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(farm, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(ranch, be good on everything)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(farm, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(farm, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(farm, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(farm, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rodeo, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(mustang, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(rodeo, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(farm, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(ranch, be good on everything)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(farm, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(ranch, be good on everything)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(rodeo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(rodeo, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(mustang, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(mustang, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rodeo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rodeo, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(ranch, be good on everything)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ranch, make about just everything taste better)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ranch, make about everything taste better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ranch, make about just everything taste)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ranch, make about just everything taste better)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(ranch, make about everything taste better)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(ranch, make about everything taste)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(ranch, make about just everything taste)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(ranch, make about everything taste)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ranch, make about everything taste better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(ranch, make about just everything taste better)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(ranch, dress damn good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(ranch, make about everything taste)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ranch, make about just everything taste)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ranch, dress damn good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ranch, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ranch, dress damn good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ranch, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ranch, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(ranch, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(ranch, dress damn good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(ranch, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(ranch, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ranch, make about just everything taste better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ranch, make about everything taste better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ranch, make about just everything taste)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ranch, make about everything taste)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ranch, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ranch, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be good on everything)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(ranch, be good on everything)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(farm, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(farm, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rodeo, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rodeo, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mustang, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(farm, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(ranch, be good on everything) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(farm, has quality bad)