rancher: fence his land

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents customer
Weight: 0.55
, person
Weight: 0.51
, worker
Weight: 0.49
Siblings farmer
Weight: 0.33
, businessman
Weight: 0.31
, veterinarian
Weight: 0.31
, elderly person
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
fence his land 1.00
fence range 0.81
also fence out deer 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rancher, fence his land)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(farmer, fence his land)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(rancher, fence his land)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(farmer, fence his land)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(farmer, fence his land)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(rancher, fence his land)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(rancher, fence his land)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(rancher, fence his land)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(rancher, also fence out deer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(rancher, fence his land)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(rancher, also fence out deer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(rancher, fence his land)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(rancher, fence range)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(rancher, fence his land)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(rancher, fence range)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(rancher, fence his land)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rancher, also fence out deer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(rancher, fence his land)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rancher, fence range)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(rancher, fence his land)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(rancher, fence range)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(rancher, fence his land)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(rancher, also fence out deer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(rancher, fence his land)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(rancher, fence his land)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rancher, fence his land)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(rancher, fence his land)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(rancher, fence his land)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rancher, fence his land)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(farmer, fence his land)