randy: be with wyatts now

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents friend
Weight: 0.52
, low life
Weight: 0.51
, character
Weight: 0.49
, guy
Weight: 0.48
Siblings dick
Weight: 0.31
, butch
Weight: 0.31
, john
Weight: 0.31
, tramp
Weight: 0.31
, jill
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with wyatts now 1.00
be with wyatts 0.88
is zuckerberg 0.76
is eckman 0.76
is lorde 0.76
is zeich 0.76
is wittman 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(randy, be with wyatts now)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(randy, be with wyatts)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(randy, is lorde)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(randy, is zuckerberg)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(randy, is zeich)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(randy, be with wyatts)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(randy, be with wyatts)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(randy, is zeich)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(randy, is zeich)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(randy, is eckman)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(randy, is lorde)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(randy, is zuckerberg)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(randy, is eckman)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(randy, is eckman)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(randy, is zeich)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(randy, is wittman)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(randy, is lorde)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(randy, is zuckerberg)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(randy, be with wyatts)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(randy, is wittman)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(randy, is eckman)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(randy, is wittman)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(randy, is wittman)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(randy, is zuckerberg)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(randy, is lorde)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(randy, be with wyatts now)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(randy, be with wyatts now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(randy, be with wyatts now)