rank: be important to military

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.61
, privilege
Weight: 0.55
, service
Weight: 0.52
, man
Weight: 0.52
Siblings ensign
Weight: 0.54
, attribute
Weight: 0.32
, status
Weight: 0.31
, level
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to military 1.00
be in military 0.96
be important in army 0.88
be in army 0.83
be in army work 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, be in military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(rank, be important to military)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(man, be in military)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(man, be in military)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, be in military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(rank, be important to military)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(rank, be important to military)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(rank, be in military)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rank, be in military)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(rank, be in military)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rank, be in military)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(rank, be important in army)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rank, be important in army)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(rank, be in army)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(rank, be important in army)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(rank, be in army work)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rank, be in army)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(rank, be in army)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rank, be in army work)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(rank, be in army work)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rank, be in army)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rank, be important in army)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(rank, be in army work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rank, be important to military)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(rank, be important to military)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(man, be in military)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(rank, be important to military) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(man, be in military)