rap music: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.64
, song
Weight: 0.64
, rapper
Weight: 0.59
, pop music
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings country music
Weight: 0.38
, love song
Weight: 0.37
, classical music
Weight: 0.37
, rap
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
be bad today 0.82
have bad reputation 0.81
be good for world 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(rap music, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(rap music, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(pop music, be bad today)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(rap music, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(pop music, be bad today)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be bad today)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(love song, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(rap music, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(rap music, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(pop music, be bad today)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(rap music, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(love song, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(love song, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(country music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(rap, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(rap, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(rap, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rap, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(classical music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(country music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(rap music, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rap music, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(rap music, be bad today)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(rap music, be bad today)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(rap music, be bad today)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(rap music, be bad today)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rap music, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(rap music, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(rap music, have bad reputation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rap music, be good for world)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(rap music, have bad reputation)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(rap music, have bad reputation)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rap music, have bad reputation)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(rap music, be good for world)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(rap music, be good for world)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(rap music, be good for world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(rap music, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(pop music, be bad today)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(love song, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(country music, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(rap, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rap, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(country music, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(pop music, be bad today)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)