rap music: is degrading

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.64
, song
Weight: 0.64
, rapper
Weight: 0.59
, pop music
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings country music
Weight: 0.38
, love song
Weight: 0.37
, classical music
Weight: 0.37
, rap
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is degrading 1.00
degrade towards women 0.79
is vulgar 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(pop music, is vulgar)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rap music, is degrading)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(rap music, is degrading)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(pop music, is vulgar)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(rap music, is degrading)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is vulgar)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(pop music, is vulgar)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(rap music, is degrading)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(rap music, is degrading)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(rap music, is degrading)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(rap music, is degrading)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(rap music, is degrading)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(rap music, degrade towards women)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(rap music, is degrading)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(rap music, degrade towards women)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rap music, is degrading)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(rap music, degrade towards women)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(rap music, is degrading)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(rap music, degrade towards women)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rap music, is degrading)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rap music, is vulgar)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(rap music, is degrading)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rap music, is vulgar)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(rap music, is degrading)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(rap music, is vulgar)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(rap music, is degrading)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(rap music, is vulgar)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(rap music, is degrading)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rap music, is degrading)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(rap music, is degrading)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(rap music, is degrading)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rap music, is degrading)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(rap music, is degrading)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pop music, is vulgar)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rap music, is degrading)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pop music, is vulgar)