rap music: is treated differently

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.64
, song
Weight: 0.64
, rapper
Weight: 0.59
, pop music
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings country music
Weight: 0.38
, love song
Weight: 0.37
, classical music
Weight: 0.37
, rap
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is treated differently 1.00
is treated 0.85
be different 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(thing, be different)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(rap music, is treated differently)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rap music, is treated differently)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(thing, be different)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rap music, is treated differently)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(thing, be different)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rap music, is treated differently)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(classical music, be different)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rap music, is treated differently)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(country music, be different)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(thing, be different)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rap music, is treated differently)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(rap music, is treated differently)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rap music, is treated differently)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(country music, be different)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(country music, be different)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rap music, is treated differently)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(classical music, be different)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(classical music, be different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rap music, is treated differently)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(rap music, is treated differently)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(rap music, is treated differently)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(rap music, is treated)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rap music, is treated differently)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(rap music, is treated)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(rap music, is treated differently)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(rap music, is treated)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rap music, is treated differently)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(rap music, is treated)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rap music, is treated differently)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rap music, be different)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(rap music, is treated differently)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rap music, be different)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rap music, is treated differently)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(rap music, be different)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(rap music, is treated differently)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(rap music, be different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(rap music, is treated differently)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(rap music, is treated differently)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rap music, is treated differently)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rap music, is treated differently)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(rap music, is treated differently)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rap music, is treated differently)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(thing, be different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rap music, is treated differently)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(country music, be different)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rap music, is treated differently)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(classical music, be different)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(rap music, is treated differently)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(thing, be different)