rap: be better than rock

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents style
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, form
Weight: 0.54
, influence
Weight: 0.53
, music
Weight: 0.51
Siblings rap music
Weight: 0.37
, rock music
Weight: 0.34
, punk rock
Weight: 0.34
, pop music
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than rock 1.00
be more popular than rock 0.93
be different to rock 0.90
be much better than music 0.86
be much better than other music 0.86
be better than country 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be better than rock)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be more popular than rock)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be better than country)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(pop music, be better than rock)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(pop music, be more popular than rock)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(pop music, be more popular than rock)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(pop music, be better than country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(rap, be better than rock)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(rap, be much better than music)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rap, be different to rock)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(rap, be more popular than rock)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(rap, be different to rock)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(rap, be more popular than rock)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(rap, be more popular than rock)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(rap, be different to rock)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(rap, be more popular than rock)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(rap, be different to rock)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(rap, be much better than music)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(rap, be better than country)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rap, be much better than other music)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(rap, be better than country)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rap, be much better than other music)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(rap, be much better than music)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(rap, be better than country)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(rap, be much better than other music)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(rap, be better than country)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(rap, be much better than music)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(rap, be much better than other music)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rap, be better than rock)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(rap, be better than rock)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(pop music, be better than rock)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(pop music, be more popular than rock)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rap, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pop music, be better than country)