rap: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents style
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, form
Weight: 0.54
, influence
Weight: 0.53
, music
Weight: 0.51
Siblings rap music
Weight: 0.37
, rock music
Weight: 0.34
, punk rock
Weight: 0.34
, pop music
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is bad now 0.84
has quality influence 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(rap, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(style, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(rap, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(rap, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(style, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(rap, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(influence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(rap, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(influence, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(style, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(music, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(style, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(music, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(influence, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(style, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(style, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is bad now)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality influence)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(rap, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(rap, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(style, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(rap, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(style, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(rap, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(influence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(rap, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rap music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rap music, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(rap music, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pop music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(rock music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(pop music, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pop music, is bad now)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(rap music, has quality influence)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(rap, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(rap, is bad now)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rap, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(rap, has quality influence)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(rap, is bad now)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(rap, is bad now)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(rap, is bad now)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(rap, has quality influence)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rap, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(rap, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(rap, has quality influence)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(rap, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(influence, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(style, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(style, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(music, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(pop music, is bad now)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(rap music, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(rap music, has quality influence)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rap music, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(influence, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(style, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(music, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(style, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(rap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)